Consumer Acceptance of Eco-Friendly Products in Pakistan: A Qualitative Study Based on Consumer Behavior Theory

Authors

  • Muhammad Fuzail Government College University Faisalabad

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62394/aurora.v2i1.186

Keywords:

eco-friendly products, consumer behavior, sustainability, pakistan, green consumption

Abstract

This study investigates the factors influencing consumer acceptance of eco-friendly products in Pakistan, using consumer behavior theory as a conceptual framework. By applying a qualitative research design, in-depth interviews were conducted with 18 participants to uncover the underlying psychological, social, and situational factors that drive or hinder sustainable consumption. The study finds that environmental awareness, attitudinal beliefs, and social norms significantly shape consumer intentions, while behavioral control barriers such as high product costs, limited accessibility, and inconvenience remain the primary inhibitors. Notably, social influence from reference groups, including family and peers, was identified as a powerful force, with younger, urban consumers showing greater eco-friendly preferences due to social pressure and media exposure. Perceived behavioral control—influenced by affordability, convenience, and availability—emerged as a critical determinant of consumer behavior. The findings reveal that while consumers express positive attitudes towards green products, practical challenges prevent the widespread adoption of eco-friendly alternatives. This research contributes to the literature by offering novel insights into the unique contextual factors influencing green consumer behavior in a developing country like Pakistan. It emphasizes the importance of tailored marketing strategies and policy interventions to address barriers and promote sustainable consumption. For marketers and policymakers, the study suggests that addressing cost concerns, improving product availability, and fostering trust in environmental claims can facilitate the adoption of eco-friendly products. Future research could explore the longitudinal impact of such interventions.

References

Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179-211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Carrington, M. J., Neville, B. A., & Whitwell, G. J. (2014). Why ethical consumers don’t walk the talk: Toward a framework for understanding the gap between the ethical purchase intentions and actual buying behavior of ethically minded consumers. Journal of Business Ethics, 121(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1672-7

Cenci, M. P., Scarazzato, T., Munchen, D. D., Dartora, P. C., Veit, H. M., Bernardes, A. M., & Dias, P. R. (2022). Eco‐friendly electronics—a comprehensive review. Advanced Materials Technologies, 7(2), 2001263.

Chen, M. F., & Chang, C. T. (2013). The influences of perceived consumer effectiveness and perceived product characteristics on consumers’ purchase intentions of green products. Journal of Business Ethics, 114(2), 287-298. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1341-1

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). Sage Publications.

Guest, G., Bunce, A., & Johnson, L. (2006). How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field Methods, 18(1), 59-82. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X05279903

Gupta, S., & Ogden, D. T. (2009). To buy or not to buy? A social dilemma perspective on green buying. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 26(6), 392-400. https://doi.org/10.1108/07363760910988201

Handriana, T., Kurniawati, M., Sangadji, S. S., Wurjaningrum, F., & Suryaningsih, I. B. (2024). Antecedents and Consequences of Green Trust in Environmentally Friendly Cosmetic Products. International Journal of Environmental Impacts, 7(4). https://doi.org/10.18280/ijei.070412

Handriana, T., Usman, I., Sangadji, S. S., & Mehta, A. M. (2025). The Environmentally Friendly Cosmetics: Perceived Values, Satisfaction, and Customer Loyalty Aspects. Malaysian Journal of Consumer and Family Economics, 34(1), 298–326. https://doi.org/10.60016/majcafe.v34.10

Hasan, D. S., & Sangadji, S. S. (2024). Fundamentals in Crafting Research and Community Service Articles. SCIENTIA: Journal of Multi Disciplinary Science, 3(1), 31–39. https://doi.org/10.62394/scientia.v3i1.102

Joshi, Y., & Rahman, Z. (2015). Factors affecting green purchase behaviour and future research directions. International Strategic Management Review, 3(1), 128-143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ism.2015.05.002

Leong, J. K., & Huang, S. (2020). The role of social media influencers in promoting sustainable consumption. Journal of Business Research, 112, 205-213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.11.063

Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2016). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation (4th ed.). Jossey-Bass.

Peattie, K. (2010). Green consumption: Behavior and norms. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 35, 195-228. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-072809-101443

Supriatin, F., Marliana, I., S. Sangadji, S., Afkar, Paerah, A., & Dharta, F. (2022). Metodologi Penelitian. Cendikia Publisher. https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/ywemh

Vermeir, I., & Verbeke, W. (2006). Sustainable food consumption: Exploring the consumer "attitude – behavioral intention" gap. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 19(2), 169-194. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-005-5485-3

Yadav, R., & Pathak, G. S. (2016). Understanding the green purchase behavior of Indian consumers: Some insights from theory of planned behavior. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 40(2), 160-168. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.12229

Downloads

Published

2025-06-23

How to Cite

Fuzail, M. (2025). Consumer Acceptance of Eco-Friendly Products in Pakistan: A Qualitative Study Based on Consumer Behavior Theory . Aurora: Journal of Emerging Business Paradigms, 2(1), 12–24. https://doi.org/10.62394/aurora.v2i1.186

Issue

Section

Articles